Product Team in Transition: A Qualitative Case Study of Team Motivation and Collaboration during Agile Adaptation DOI: https://doi.org/10.33093/ijomfa.2024.5.2.3

Main Article Content

Ahmad Murtadha Abdul Wahab
Magiswary Dorasamy
Abdul Aziz Ahmad

Abstract

Agile approaches have received organisation acceptance as effective frameworks for managing complicated projects in rapidly changing situations. This study explores the challenges of agile adaptation in product team motivation that attempted to implement the existing agile adaptation. In order to implement the agile adaptation, it is essential for the product team to make adjustments and collaborate with others. Inadequate procedures and outside factors have been identified by some studies as barriers to existing agile adaptation (Conboy et al., 2011). Although implementing an agile approach has numerous advantages, doing so can be more complex with adaption and modification processes, especially to align with the organisation's working environment, current team motivation or the effectiveness of current collaboration. These require extensive changes across the team.  Intrinsic motivation is crucial for high levels of output and quality. The qualitative method of semi-structured interviews was chosen to focus in-depth on agile practitioners' mindsets and adaptation acceptance who had just undergone agile adaptation experience. Interviews with five experienced agile practitioners in a telecommunications company were conducted to analyse a product team, its dynamics and behaviours, and what has been learned about human interactions, such as motivation and collaboration in the context of agile adaption, conflict, and challenges. We found that it is important for an agile product team with multidisciplinary expertise to work towards a common goal, foster team spirit, share the vision, and set clear goals with good collaboration and flexibility in reprioritising the tasks.


 

Article Details

Section
Management, Finance and Accounting

References

Alvarez, A., & Sánchez, B. B. (2022). Agile transformation processes: Impact of factors in the success of failure: An ongoing work on identifying and characterising what influences transformations. In 2022 17th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), IEEE.

Annosi, M. C., Mattarelli, E., Micelotta, E., & Martini, A. (2022). Logics' shift and depletion of innovation: A multi-level study of agile use in a multinational telco company. Information and Organization, 32(3), 100421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100421

Asproni, G. (2004). Motivation, teamwork, and agile development. Agile Times, 4(1), 8–15.

Balashova, E. S., & Gromova, E. A. (2017). Agile project management in telecommunications industry. Revista Espacios, 38(41).

Beck, K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J., Hunt, A., Jeffries, R., et al. (2001) Manifesto for Agile Software Development.

Boehm, B. (2002). Get ready for agile methods with care. Computer, 35(1), 64–69.

Cao, L., Mohan, K., Xu, P., & Ramesh, B. (2009). A framework for adapting agile development methodologies. European Journal of Information Systems, 18(4), 332–343.

Cohen, D., Lindvall, M., & Costa, P. (2004). An introduction to agile methods. Adv. Comput, 62(03), 1-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2458(03)62001-2

Conboy, K., Coyle, S., Wang, X., & Pikkarainen, M. (2011). People over process: Key challenges in agile development. IEEE Software, 28(4), 48–57.

Corona, B., & Muñoz, M. (2022). Assessing the knowledge and use of agile methods: A case study in 15 SMEs of Mexico. In 2022 IEEE Mexican International Conference on Computer Science (ENC), IEEE.

Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M., & Lassenius, C. (2016). Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 119, 87-108.

Fagerholm, F., Ikonen, M., Kettunen, P., Münch, J., Roto, V., & Abrahamsson, P. (2015). Performance alignment work: how software developers experience the continuous adaptation of team performance in lean and agile environments. Information and Software Technology, 64, 132–147.

Garud, R., Tuertscher, P., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Perspectives on innovation processes. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 775-819. 10.1080/19416520.2013.791066.

Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social problems, 12(4), 436-445.

Grass, A., Backmann, J., & Hoegl, M. (2020). From empowerment dynamics to team adaptability: Exploring and conceptualising the continuous agile team innovation process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(4), 324–351.

Gunasekaran, A., Yusuf, Y. Y., Adeleye, E. O., Papadopoulos, T., Kovvuri, D., & Geyi, D. A. G. (2019). Agile manufacturing: an evolutionary review of practices. International Journal of Production Research, 57(15-16), 5154-5174.

Hummel, M. (2014). State-of-the-art: A systematic literature review on agile information systems development. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE.

Jovanovic, M., Mesquida, antoni L., Mas, antonia, & Colomo-Palacios, R. (2020). Agile transition and adoption frameworks, issues and factors: A systematic mapping. IEEE Access, 8, 15711-15735. https://doi.org/10.1109/aCCESS.2020.2967839.

Julian, B., Noble, J., & Anslow, C. (2019). Agile practices in practice: towards a theory of agile adoption and process evolution. In Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming: 20th International Conference, XP 2019, Montréal, QC, Canada, May 21–25, 2019, Proceedings 20. Springer International Publishing.

Kotter, John, Emeritus, P., & School, H. B. (2023). Subrat Kumar Sundar Ray. In John P Kotter.

Loiro, C., Castro, H., Ávila, P., Cruz-Cunha, M. M., Putnik, G. D., & Ferreira, L. (2019). Agile project management: A communicational workflow proposal. Procedia Computer Science, 164, 485–490.

McGregor, L., & Doshi, N. (2018). Why agile goes awry—And how to fix it. Harvard Business Review.

Mishra, A., Abdalhamid, S., Mishra, D., & Ostrovska, S. (2021). Organisational issues in embracing Agile methods: an empirical assessment. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 12(6), 1420-1433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01350-1

Mkoba, E. S., and Marnewick, C. (2022). Organisational culture attributes influencing the adoption of agile practices: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 7(1), 11690. https://doi.org/10.55267/iadt.07.11690.

Nasehi, A. (2013). A Quantitative Study on Critical Success Factors in Agile Software Development Projects; Case Study IT Company (Dissertation, University of Borås/School of Business and IT).

Poth, A., Sasabe, S., Mas, A., & Mesquida, A.-L. (2018). Lean and agile software process improvement in traditional and agile environments. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 7, e1986. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1986

Shaheen, M., Gupta, R., & Kumar, Y. L. N. (2016). Exploring dimensions of teachers' OCB from stakeholder's perspective: A Study in India. Qualitative Report, 21(6), 1095–1117.

Theunissen, W. H. M. (2003). A case-study based assessment of Agile software development. University of Pretoria (South Africa).

Tolfo C, Wazlawick RS, Ferreira MGG, Forcellini FA (2011). Agile methods and organisational culture: Reflections about cultural levels. J Softw Maint Evol Res Pract, 23(6), 423–441.

Tripp, J. F., & Armstrong, D. J. (2014). Exploring the relationship between organisational adoption motives and the tailoring of agile methods. In 2014, the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE.