Validity and Reliability of a Conceptual Framework on Enhancing Learning for Students via Kinect: A Pilot Test

Main Article Content

Marianne Too
Siong Hoe Lau
Choo Kim Tan


Traditional method of teaching poses two significant problems – not all students learn alike, and the physical interaction needed poses health risk during pandemic. As such, for these students, an alternative learning method such as those that uses natural user interface (NUI) can be considered. This method would be beneficial for kinesthetic type learners and can be conducted remotely. The alternative learning program is a complementary method, thus still incorporates the current subject syllabus. However, the delivery, learning and execution of the syllabus will be varied. In minimizing these gaps found in the current Malaysian education system, a conceptual framework utilizing Microsoft Kinect is proposed. Since this is a new framework, a pilot study is needed to gauge the validity and reliability of the survey instrument prior to embarking on further study on the outcome of the alternative learning program. Face and content validity conducted on the questionnaire were found to be clear, not confusing, and measures what the questions were supposed to measure. Reliability measured using Cronbach’s Alpha indicated values above the acceptable range. Thus, these results indicate that the instrument is valid and reliable to be applied for data collection in the future study to assess the intention of Malaysian students to adopt an alternative medium for learning.

[Manuscript received: 22 October 2023 | Accepted: 13 March 2024 | Published: : 30 April 2024]

Article Details

How to Cite
Too, M., Lau, S. H., & Tan, C. K. (2024). Validity and Reliability of a Conceptual Framework on Enhancing Learning for Students via Kinect: A Pilot Test. International Journal on Robotics, Automation and Sciences, 6(1), 59–63.


M. S. M. Too and R. K. Y. Chang, “A fundamental study of an alternative learning framework utilizing natural user interface (nui) for physically disabled students,” International Journal on Robotics, Automation and Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2023.

C. C. Lim, K. S. Sim and C. K. Toa, “Development of visual-based rehabilitation using sensors for stroke patient,” International Journal on Robotics, Automation and Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 25–30, 2020.

R. K. Y. Chang, K. S. Sim, S. H. Lau and M. S. M. Too, “Kinect-based framework for motor rehabilitation,” in The 2016 International Conference on Robotics, Automation and Sciences (ICORAS 2016), Melaka, Malaysia, 2016, vol. 1, no. 1.

M. S. M. Too, S. H. Lau, P. T. Ong, K. S. Sim and R. K. Y. Chang, “Kinect-based framework for enhanced learning of disabled students,” in The 2016 International Conference on Robotics, Automation and Sciences (ICORAS 2016), Melaka, Malaysia, 2016, vol. 1, no. 1.

G. Kinchin, N. Ismail and J.-A. Edwards, “Pilot study: Does it really matter? Learning lessons from conducting a pilot study for a qualitative PhD thesis,” International Journal of Social Science Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-17, 2018.

V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis and F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view,” MIS quarterly, pp. 425-478, 2003.

J. Fantuzzo, E. Tighe and S. Childs, “Family involvement questionnaire: A multivariate assessment of family participation in early childhood education,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 367–376, 2000.

H. Gehlbach, “Family-school relationships survey,”,, No date.

E. L., Deci and R. M. Ryan, “SDT: Questionnaires: Intrinsic motivation inventory (imi),” , 2015.

O. E. Hall and S. M. Hord, Change in schools: Facilitating the process. New York: State University of New York Press, 1987.

N. D. Fleming and C. Mills, “Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection,” To Improve the Academy, vol. 11, pp. 137, 1997.

J. Kim and K. S.-S. Lee, “Conceptual model to predict Filipino teachers’ adoption of ICT-based instruction in class: Using the UTAUT model,” Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2020.

M. M. M. Abbad, “Using the UTAUT model to understand students’ usage of e-learning systems in developing countries,” Education and Information Technologies, 2021.

P. Hurley and N. V. Dyke, “Australian investment in education: Higher education,” Mitchell Institute, 2020.

V. Venkatesh, J. Y. Thong and X. Xu, “Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 328-376, 2016.

S. A. Raza, W. Qazi, A. K. Khan and J. Salam, “Social isolation and acceptance of the learning management system (lms) in the time of covid-19 pandemic: An expansion of the utaut model,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 183 – 208, 2020.

A. Dönmez-Turan, and M. Kir, “User anxiety as an external variable of technology acceptance model: A meta-analytic study,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 158, pp. 715-724, 2019.

P. Y. Chen and G. J. Hwang, “An empirical examination of the effect of self-regulation and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (utaut) factors on the online learning behavioural intention of college students,” Asia Pacific Journal of Education, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 79-95, 2019.

A. Nurkhin, A. Rohman and H. Mukhibad, “Using utaut model to understand the accounting student's intention to use e-Journal,” International Business Management, vol. 11, pp. 1637-1641, 2017.

A. Nunes, T. Limpo, C. F. Lima and S. L. Castro, “Short scales for the assessment of personality traits: Development and validation of the Portuguese ten-item personality inventory (TIPI),” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 9, pp. 461, 2018.

M. Martins, J. S. Farias, P. H. M. Albuquerque and D. S. Pereira, “Adoption of technology for reading purposes: A study of e-books acceptance,” Brazilian Business Review (BBR), vol 15, no. 6, pp. 568-588, 2018.

L. Lara and M. Saracostti, “Effect of parental involvement on children’s academic achievement in Chile,” Front. Psychol. vol. 10, pp. 1464, 2019.

C. Lin, “Applying the UTAUT model to understand factors affecting the use of e-books in Fujian, China,” M.S. thesis, China, 2018.

K. S. Ostrow and N. Heffernan, “Testing the validity and reliability of intrinsic motivation inventory subscales within ASSISTments,” in Penstein Rose, C., et al. Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10947, Springer, Cham, 2018.

L. Sharma and M. Srivastava, “Teachers’ motivation to adopt technology in higher education,” Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, vol. 12, no. 4, 2019.

J. Wang and R. Hooi, “The moderation effect of workplace experience on innovation motivation: a study of stem faculty in Singapore,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 31, pp. 862 – 874, 2019.

W. L. Lam, O. Ibrahim, M. Dalvi-Esfahani, H. Shahbazi and M. Nilashi, “The moderating effect of experience on the intention to adopt mobile social network sites for pedagogical purposes: An extension of the technology acceptance model,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 23, pp. 2477–2498, 2018.

P. Qiao, X. Zhu, Y. Guo, Y. Sun and C. Qin, “the development and adoption of online learning in pre- and post-covid-19: Combination of technological system evolution theory and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology,” Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 162, 2021.

A. A. Hayat, K. Shateri, M. Amini and N. Shokrpour, “Relationships between academic self-efficacy, learning-related emotions, and metacognitive learning strategies with academic performance in medical students: A structural equation model,” BMC Med Educ, vol. 20, no. 76, 2020.

E. T. Straub, “Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 625-649, 2009.

M. M. Alamri, M. A. Almaiah and W. M. Al-Rahmi, “The role of compatibility and task-technology fit (ttf): On social networking applications (snas) usage as sustainability in higher education,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 161668–1616681, 2020.

V. Balakrishnan and C. L. Gan, “Students’ learning styles and their effects on the use of social media technology for learning,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 808-821, 2016.

E. Y. Huang, S. W. Lin and T. K. Huang, “What type of learning style leads to online participation in the mixed-mode e-learning environment? A study of software usage instruction,” Computers & Education, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 338–349, 2012.

G. P. Pratama and A. Pinayani, “Effect of learning style on learning outcomes with mediator variable learning motivation,” International Conference on Economics, Education, Business and Accounting, KnE Social Sciences, pp. 808–819, 2019.

A. Wong and H. Yamat, “Testing the validity and reliability of the “learn, pick, flip, check, reward” (lpfcr) card game in homophone comprehension,” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 22–32, 2020.

V. Braun, V. Clarke, N. Hayfield and G. Terry, “Thematic analysis,” in Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, P. Liamputtong, Ed. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019, pp. 843–860.

K. S. Taber, “The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education,” Research in Science Education, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1273–1296, 2018.

L. Lara and M. Saracostti, “Effect of parental involvement on children’s academic achievement in Chile,” Front. Psychol., Vol. 10, pp. 1464, 2019.

L. Puspitasari, A. In’am and M. Syaifuddin, “Analysis of students’ creative thinking in solving arithmetic problems,“ International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 49-60, 2019.