Views from Journalists: Social Media Practice in Malaysian Newsrooms
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Social media has transformed the world of journalism and opened up channels for greater communication between journalists and news organisations with the public. This research aims to identify the perception of Malaysian journalists on the use of social media in the newsrooms. In addition, the research discusses the use of social media in the journalistic practice of Malaysian newsrooms. Snowball sampling was adopted for in-depth interviews with journalists from various Malaysian news organisations. Findings suggest that the majority of Malaysian journalists view the adoption of social media positively as a medium to engage with the audience of the news organisation. While social media algorithm has their benefits, journalists expressed concerns over its technology that could lead to an invasion of privacy and confirmation bias. Finally, findings suggest that though social media adoption in newsrooms is seen as beneficial in many aspects of journalistic work, journalists are cautious about adopting its technology due to ethical concerns. This signifies the awareness of media literacy among journalists interviewed. This study addresses the lack of non-Western literature on social media newsroom practices. It contributes to the literature on newsroom practice in Malaysia and social media practice among journalists in nations of the South.
Article Details
References
Ahmad, N. (2017). The decline of conventional news media and challenges of immersing in new technology. ESharp, 1(25), 71–82. https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_529633_en.pdf
Alhojailan, M. I. (2012). Thematic analysis: A critical review of its process and evaluation. West East Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1316724
Al Yousufi, Y. H. (2019). The Role of Social Media Journalists in TV News: Their Effects on the Profession and Identity of TV Journalism, the Quality of News, and the Audience Engagement [University of South Florida]. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/7723
Cambridge Dictionary. (2023). Algorithm. Cambridge University Press. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/algorithm
Carlson, M. (2019). News Algorithms, Photojournalism and the Assumption of Mechanical Objectivity in Journalism. Digital Journalism, 7(8), 1117–1133. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1601577
Cho, H., Cannon, J., Lopez, R., & Li, W. (2022). Social media literacy: A conceptual framework. New Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211068530
Distera Adeline, H., & Ahmad, N. (2022). Why do people fall for fake news? Patterns in news consumption and decision-making. Journal of Media and Information Warfare, 15(3), 27–38.
Gleason, S. (2010). Harnessing social media: News outlets are assigning staffers to focus on networking. American Journalism Review, 32(1), 6+.
https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A223659009/AONE?u=anon~fa27ae36&sid=googleScholar&xid=2c4d6049
Hamzah, M., & Esa, I. L. (2020). Uncovering the factors influencing the technological adaptation of Twitter usage among journalists in the transforming journalism practice. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 36(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2020-3604-01
Hanusch, F., & Bruns, A. (2017). Journalistic branding on Twitter: A representative study of Australian journalists’ profile descriptions. Digital Journalism, 5(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1152161
Hedman, U. (2016). Transparency in journalists’ tweets: Much ado about nothing? Digital Journalism, 4(3), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1132433
Holton, A. E., & Molyneux, L. (2017). Identity lost? The personal impact of brand journalism. Journalism, 18(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915608816
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview. Sage Publications.
Murugiah, S. (2022, July 20). Malaysia the 11th most data-breached country in 2Q22. The Edge.
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., & Nielsen, R. N. (2020). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020. In Reuters Institute University of Oxford. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-06/DNR_2020_FINAL.pdf
Omena, J. J., Rabello, E. T., & Mintz, A. G. (2020). Digital Methods for Hashtag Engagement Research. Social Media and Society, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120940697
Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad. (2010). Laws of Malaysia Act 709. https://www.kkd.gov.my/pdf/Personal%20Data%20Protection%20Act%202010.pdf
Personal Data Protection Act 2010 (Act 709). (2010). Laws of Malaysia. https://www.pdp.gov.my/jpdpv2/assets/2020/01/Personal-Data-Protection-Act-2010.pdf
Qerimi, G., & Gërguri, D. (2022). Infodemic and the crisis of distinguishing disinformation from accurate information: Case study on the use of Facebook in Kosovo during COVID-19. Media and Communication, 10(3), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5152
Robbie, D. (2018). A decade of resistance: The Pacific Media Centre, Pacific Media Watch, impunity and human rights. Pacific Journalism Review, 24(2), 12–32. www.pacmediawatch.aut.ac.nz
Taylor, S. H., & Choi, M. (2022). An Initial Conceptualisation of Algorithm Responsiveness: Comparing Perceptions of Algorithms Across Social Media Platforms. Social Media and Society, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221144322