Anti-Hopping Law in Malaysia: An Analysis of the Legal Framework and Enforcement Mechanisms
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Anti-hopping law was introduced in Malaysia through a constitutional amendment referred to as the Constitution (Amendment) Act (No. 3) 2022. The objective of this law was to prevent elected representatives at both the Federal and State levels from engaging in party-hopping. Despite the enactment of this law, issues have emerged due to the loopholes within the legal framework and the mechanisms for its enforcement. The provisions outlined in the Federal Constitution concerning situations leading to seat vacancies give rise to ambiguity and debate. In addition, the variations in the Speaker’s decisions regarding seat vacancies also call into question the efficacy of this law. These issues have led numerous elected representatives to exploit the vulnerabilities inherent in this law. The article analyses the legal framework of the anti-hopping law in Malaysia as well as Singapore, and New Zealand for comparison. It also discusses the enforcement mechanisms of the anti-hopping law in Malaysia, as well as proposes recommendations aimed at enhancing long-term political stability in Malaysia. There is a need for a responsible political environment to encourage greater public participation in elections, fostering a more inclusive and democratic Malaysia where every citizen's vote truly matters.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
‘Kertas Kajian Awal Berkaitan Suatu Undang-Undang Lompat Parti Untuk Malaysia’ (Bahagian Hal Ehwal Undang-undang, December 2021).
Bjorn Dressel and Tomoo Inoue, ‘Politics and the Federal Court of Malaysia, 1960–2018: An Empirical Investigation’ (2020) 9(1) Asian Journal of Law and Society 26 <https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2020.18>
Cheang Bryan and Choy Donovan, ‘Culture of Meritocracy, Political Hegemony, and Singapore’s Development’ (2024) 37 International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 265 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-023-09458-x>
Faridah Jalil, ‘Judicial Accountability: A Study of Malaysia Copy’ (PHD thesis, University of Warwick 2007)
Fraenkel Jon, ‘Party-Hopping Laws in the Southern Hemisphere’ (2012) 64(2) Political Science 106
Helen Ting Mu Hung, ‘Electoral System Change for a More Democratic Malaysia? Challenges and Options’ [2022] Institute of Malaysian and International Studies, Univerisit Kebangsaan Malaysia
Irma Wani Othman, Mohd Azri Ibrahim and Mohd Sohaimi Esa, ‘Democratization and Mature Elections: A Study of Youth Political Participation in Voters 18 and Automatic Voter Registration’ (2022) 7(29) International Journal of Law, Government and Communication 600 <https://doi.org/10.35631/IJLGC.729041>
Izmi Izdiharuddin Che Jamaludin Mahmud and Khairul Anuar Abdul Hadi, ‘From Common Law Principles to Judicial Activism: The Duty to Provide Reasoned Decisions in Administrative Law in Malaysia’ (2023) 26(2) Gading Journal for Social Sciences < https://gadingssuitm.com/index.php/gadingss/article/view/386>
Jack Vowles and Janine Hayward, ‘Ballot Structure, District Magnitude and Descriptive Representation: The Case of New Zealand Local Council Elections’ (2021) 56(3) Australian Journal of Political Science 225 < https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2021.1935449>
Khairulanuar Yahaya, ‘Sheraton Move Turned Parliament Into Prostitution Den–Mahfuz’ (Malaysia Gazette, 11 April 2022) <https://malaysiagazette.com/2022/04/11/sheraton-move-turned-parliament-into-prostitution-den-mahfuz/>
Lorne Neudorf, ‘Judicial Independence in Malaysia’ [2017] The Dynamics of Judicial Independence 47, <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49884-3_2>
Mohd Irwan Syazli Saidin, ‘Malaysia’s Crisis of Political Legitimacy: Understanding the 2020 Power Transition and ‘Sheraton Move’ Polemics Through the ‘Eyes’ of Malaysian Political Science Graduates’ (2023) 9(1) Cogent Social Sciences <https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2222572>
Muhamad Nadzri Mohamed Noor, ‘The 14th General Election, the Fall of Barisan Nasional, and Political Development in Malaysia, 1957-2018’ (2018) 37(3) Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 139 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/186810341803700307>
Nik Ahmad Kamal Nik Mahmod, ‘Undang-Undang Antilompat Parti: Pandangan Sepintas Lalu’ (2023) 35(1) Kanun: Jurnal Undang-Undang Malaysia <http://jurnal.dbp.my/index.php/Kanun/article/view/8454>
Norazlina Abdul Aziz and others, ‘An Overview of Judicial Review in The Malaysian Court’ (2023) 13(1) International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 336 <https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i1/16182>
Nurhafilah Musa, ‘Federalism, Constitutionalism and Democratic Society in Multicultural Societies–A Case Study of Malaysia’ (2008) IFF Summer University <https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/31872055/federalism__constitutionalism_and_democratic_society-_case_study_of_malaysia-libre.pdf>
Raiz Mukhliz Azman Aziz, ‘Election Disputes: A Comparative Analysis of the Judicial Review Process in Malaysia and Indonesia’ (2024) 32(2) International Islamic University Malaysia Law Journal 297 <https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v32i2.946>
Rangaswamy D, ‘Judicial Accountability: A Comparative Note on India and Malaysia’ (2024) 4(1) Asian Journal of Law and Policy 25 <https://doi.org/10.33093/ajlp.2024.2>
Roslina Abdul Latif, ‘Early Days of the Malaysian Power Shift: A Look at Two Media Reports’ [2021] Academia Letters <https://doi.org/10.20935/al944>
Sheila Ramalingam, ’Stop the Hop!’ [2022] 2 Malayan Law Journal cccxv
Wilson Tze Vern Tay, ‘Constitutional Overlaps: Judicial Power and the Executive and Legislative Arms of Government’ [2020] Centre for Asian Legal Studies Work-in-Progress (WiP) Series <https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3606362>